Catherine Rinderknecht Moritz- Violinist
  • Home
  • Biography
  • Media
    • Photos
  • Upcoming Events
  • Blog
  • Shared Stories
    • Collaborators
    • Support
  • Contact

You’re not fond of a piece. What now?

11/2/2018

1 Comment

 
When I did my re-introductory post a few weeks ago, I asked for suggestions for blog post topics in the comments. Today, I decided to tackle one from Tony Manfredonia that definitely was a challenge for me to blog about! He commented with:

“What I’d love to hear is if you’ve ever come across a piece (even if you leave it anonymous) that you played, you weren’t fond of. New music, particularly. Was it commissioned? Were you assigned it? I’d simply love to hear if you’ve ever struggled with “enjoying” a new piece of music and how you handled it.”

On a post that asks about overcoming the challenge of not being fond of a piece, I should probably preface this with the general notion that I desperately seek connection to any piece I play even if I’m not fond of it Even in pieces that I absolutely adore, I’m constantly seeking a deeper connection with it. That’s something which is central to me as a performer- I’m always seeking to know a piece better so I can share it more fully. I’ve done a number of sometimes (crazy) things and found connections that may seem tenuous, but they speak to me so I can “speak” the piece for an audience. So, if I’m seeking connection in something I love, you’d better believe I do the same even more fervently for a piece I just “don’t get” yet (and I believe yet is ALWAYS the key word in this case).

In my younger days (read: 10+ years ago), I struggled to connect with Mozart. I thought his music was too happy and not emotional enough. It didn’t make me feel enough, anyway. I was THAT person who would very loudly proclaim to my friends how much I didn’t enjoy his music when I was “stuck” playing it. His 5th violin concerto in particular was especially difficult for me to appreciate even though it’s an absolutely wonderful piece of music. However, when I studied the 4th violin concerto a couple of years later, something clicked with me because I was the same age as Mozart was when he had written that concerto. Suddenly, everything about it seemed more relatable. Since then, I’ve held a high regard for that concerto and, more importantly, a greater respect for Mozart. I still don’t actively seek out his music to listen to or play (although I love his chamber music now), but I have a much greater appreciation for the nuance and operatic drama that infuses his work. I share this particular example because, though I’ve often struggled to appreciate many pieces of new music, it’s more about lacking a connection with the piece or composer than finding an aesthetic difficult.

I’ve had a number of challenging pieces written for me over the years. Some I absolutely loved even though I struggled to figure out how to inflect the phrasing so I could bring them to life. Some, I desperately wanted to love, but found that I couldn’t wrap my mind around form or phrase. Still others were so personal that I had to explore emotionally painful things for me and the composers who wrote them for me. I remember once that I struggled to connect with a piece, but a timeline forced me to play it before I fully understood it. I felt awful because it felt so unfinished even though I put everything I had into the piece. I knew the composer and respected how he talked about music so a personal connection wasn’t the problem. With all of the analytical tools I had available to me at the time, I did the best I could. I looked at form, planned gestures, and made comparisons to actions in my life that bring me clarity (journaling). I still wasn’t satisfied with my performance. Thinking about this topic, I still feel guilt about “leaving something on the table” with that piece although I’m not sure I could have done anything differently.

It comes down to being willing to find that connection. You may never like a piece even if you desperately want to. It feels awful if it’s written for you and you don’t like it, but you can’t force yourself to like a piece that you just…don’t. However, if you refuse to challenge yourself to delve deeply into it anyway, you’re doing yourself and your collaborator a terrible disservice. Here’s my advice when faced with a piece of music you just “don’t get”:
1. Be willing to look for connections. You’d be willing to do it for pieces by some dead guy you never knew, how much more should you do be willing to find connections for a piece written by someone in your life? I promise that you’ll find something. Even if it helps with the smallest portion of the piece, it’s helpful.
2. Do the thing that seems crazy to understand a piece. I once practiced a piece based on a yoga vinyasa in the poses as much as possible (there’s photographic proof on instagram if you’re willing to look back that far). Standing with my legs in Warrior 2 (I couldn’t extend my arms out since I was playing) was surprisingly helpful for understanding the phrasing in that particular section.
3. Be willing to go to difficult emotional places. There have been a couple of pieces written for me that have felt so personal that I was taken aback by being given that kind of emotional content. I’ve learned that if a collaborator chooses to write a particular piece for you, they trust that you’ll say what they give you when you play their pieces. It’s a privilege so don’t take it lightly.

Performers, what have you done to help connect with a piece of music you “don’t get?” Please share your advice in the comments below!

If you liked the change of pace in topics from my list (yes, I keep a list that I want to write about), leave me a suggestion. I’ll probably use it. :)




1 Comment

Score studying: It’s Coloring Time for Adults!

9/28/2018

0 Comments

 
Just over two years ago, I shared a picture on Instagram of my laptop open to play various recordings of the Adagio from Bach’s C Major Solo Sonata, the score, a copy of the score (because I only like to use pencil on my actual scores, but doodling all over on copies in color is fair game), and my colored pencils. I was doing an exercise that was first suggested to me by my professor about six years ago: listen to different recordings of a piece you’re studying and mark the musical choices of these violinists in different colors. The goal of this exercise was to highlight their similarities and differences with the idea that, if they all do a particular thing, it’s a convention you probably shouldn’t ignore. Conversely, there may be some pretty significant differences in phrase shape. I love seeing how different interpretations of the same harmonic frameworks and structure can unfold through different chord voicing and considerations for register and texture. Of course, this analysis can be used with other music for inspiration and guidance, but it seems to be a necessary component of studying any movement of solo Bach.

​If I want to build a solid analytical framework, I’ll listen to at least three different recordings of a particular piece. Five is better since there’s usually more variety in interpretations. Anything more than five seems excessive (and is hard to notate on a single copy of a score!), but I’ve done it before. By marking what I hear, I end up with a visual representation of my aural experience. What I end up with is nearly a work of art in its own right. These colorful scores become inspiration for me. They help me to unravel possibilities and encourage me to delve all the more deeply into the score of a piece. In the case of solo Bach, many of the artistic decisions are clarified by a harmonic analysis and studying the voicing of the chords (considering register, melody, bass line, and interesting motion). From there, I can see exactly what these musicians were prioritizing as they interpreted the piece.

​
In the past couple of years, chord voicing has become of increasing interest to me. My own comments about my process of learning (or re-learning) a movement of Bach have often returned to something like “I’m not voicing that the way I want to yet. I’ll sort it out and my phrasing will make sense.” I realize it’s all too easy to make voicing the scapegoat for all manner of issues, but so many considerations go into voicing chords that it’s a useful way of framing my practicing. Depending on what structural part of the chord or harmonically interesting line I want to highlight, how I use the bow and break the chord (a necessity since our bridges are curved, not flat) is incredibly important. To be exactly where I want to be in the bow to create the shape I want for the phrase is determined by how I use the bow in the preceding passage.
Picture
Here’s what the C Major Sonata Adagio looked like when I got done with it! I listened to NINE different recordings. Possible, but cluttered.

One of my favorite ways to provide a visual reminder for what I’d like to prioritize is using highlighter tape. When I was younger, I used it to mark difficult passages that needed more attention in my practice. I loved it because, when I felt like I had sufficiently addressed any issues, the tape was removable and I could clear my score without damaging it! I also found that I could write on it in pencil so it didn’t hinder my usage of the score in any way. As I began studying my first solo Bach fugue, I used the tape to highlight the fugue subject or fragments of it. By drawing my attention to it visually, I was able to prioritize bringing it to the foreground of the texture when it was buried within chords (hey look, I’m talking about voicing again in solo Bach…go figure!). More recently, I’ve been using it while re-visiting the Chaconne from the d minor partita. The treatment D-C#-D motion in cadential progressions is fascinating to me and often the most interesting voice to my taste. The pitch I most associated with consonance and release reaches the height of tension in these progressions such that the leading tone is heard as relief to it. So, to make sure I draw the ear toward this progression throughout the piece, I’ve marked them all with highlighter tape so I know what I want to bring to the foreground.
Picture
A portion of the Bach C Major Fugue with the subject marked with highlighter tape
Picture
Using highlighter tape to mark the cadential figures I find so intriguing

It’s all too easy to become overly cerebral with these exercises and get so caught up in the detail that the musicality becomes lost. However, I’ve found that by looking this closely at the score away from my instrument, I’m left with a clearer understanding of the musical inflection I want to craft. Side note: I need to give a huge shoutout to the Parker Quartet for talking about “inflecting” phrases during their masterclass for the University of Iowa String Quartet Residency Program on Monday- I’ve been mulling over how perfect that term is for what we do ever since then and I’m so grateful for the inspiration. By focusing on these details, I’m often led to larger-scale musical questions. Here are some examples:
1. How does the register of the fugue subject and the key area its in influence the character?
2. In what ways do the qualities I associate with the strings of my particular violin inflect the general character of a passage?
3. How does the texture of a particular passage influence my dynamic level?

My answers to these and other questions directly guide my inflections on a piece. When I approach the piece with my violin again after taking the time to study it in one (or more) of these ways, my inflection on the piece is much more clear. Rather than fighting the score, I’m working with it for a more nuanced performance.


What are some ways studying scores has benefited your practice? What are some techniques you use? Composers, do you leave any “easter eggs” in your music for discerning performers to find, or are they subconsciously placed? Please share in the comments section!
0 Comments
    Picture

    Archives

    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    June 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    October 2015
    September 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    December 2014

    Categories

    All
    Amarillo Symphony
    Audition Prep
    Bach
    Collaborations
    Festivals
    House Keeping
    House-keeping
    Introduction
    New Music
    Performances
    Score Studying
    Summer
    There Is No Comfort Zone
    WoodFest

    RSS Feed

Copyright Catherine Rinderknecht Moritz, 2024
  • Home
  • Biography
  • Media
    • Photos
  • Upcoming Events
  • Blog
  • Shared Stories
    • Collaborators
    • Support
  • Contact